| Outline:
|
Number of Items |
|
|
| |
1. Preparation and Interview Setting |
12 |
|
| |
A. Review case facts to identify the scope of the investigation.
|
|
|
| |
B. Identify the elements of the crime or policy violation, which
must be proven. |
|
|
| |
C. Apply organization’s policy for conducting interviews.
|
|
|
| |
D. Review case facts to identify the subjects to be interviewed.
|
|
|
| |
E. Determine the best interview sequence in cases involving
multiple subjects. |
|
|
| |
F. Use internal and external sources of information to provide
information on the subjects.
|
|
|
| |
G. Use background information to determine the subject’s possible
motives for the incident.
|
|
|
| |
H. Identify modus operandi of the offender.
|
|
|
| |
I.
Evaluate the information to determine possible involvement
in other incidents. |
|
|
| |
J. Review evidence applicable to the interview.
|
|
|
| |
K. Consult with decision makers (e.g. state’s attorney, human
resources, etc.) to determine elements necessary for post
interview resolution. |
|
|
| |
L. Prepare case evidence and reports for subject interview.
|
|
|
| |
M. Recognize pitfalls or explanations a subject may make to
explain away the investigative evidence.
|
|
|
| |
N. Make notification of a planned interview according to an
organization’s protocols.
|
|
|
| |
O. Determine policy and procedure for dealing with union representation,
lawyers, or parents as appropriate.
|
|
|
| |
P. Determine the need for any reasonable accommodations (e.g.
translator, wheel chair accessibility, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
Q. Select an appropriate time and location for the interview.
|
|
|
| |
R. Select an appropriate witness(es) for the interview.
|
|
|
| |
S. Prepare the witness(es) for the interview.
|
|
|
| |
T. Evaluate the interview setting for potential distractions.
|
|
|
| |
U. Determine appropriate seating positions for subject, interviewer,
and witness.
|
|
|
| |
V. Verify that any required interview equipment and supplies
are present and functional (e.g. phone, AV, tape recorder,
forms). |
|
|
| |
W. Determine the policy on audio/visual recording of the interview.
|
|
|
| |
2.
Legal Aspects |
13 |
|
| |
- Identify appropriate arrest and search requirements.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify the common civil actions taken against organizations
or interviewers after an interview (e.g. false arrest,
defamation of character, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize when Miranda warnings must be used.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine whether the interview to be conducted poses
any unique liability to the interviewer or organization
(e.g., class action lawsuits, pending litigation, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
- Obtain information that establishes the jurisdiction
for the case.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the requirements for determining if an admission
is voluntary.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine whether the interview is custodial or non-custodial.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize when a non-custodial interview has become
custodial.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize when an interviewers actions cause an interview
to become custodial in nature.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine labor law requirements for the interview (e.g.,
child labor, final pay, union contract, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the legal limits of restraining a subject.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify situations when it is appropriate to make an
audio/visual recordings of the interview or confession.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine the appropriate length of time for the interview.
|
|
|
| |
- Evaluate the legal aspects and problems of having a
witness present in the room.
|
|
|
| |
- Apply the Weingarten or Garrity rules to the interview.
|
|
|
| |
- React appropriately to subject’s request for an attorney.
|
|
|
| |
3.
False Confessions |
6 |
|
| |
- Recognize when a false confession may have been made.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize common individual traits found in people who
make false confessions.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify common situations in which false confessions
might occur.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify individuals prone to giving false confessions.
|
|
|
| |
- Review existing investigative facts to be able to test
against the subject’s confession.
|
|
|
| |
- Substantiate the subject’s admissions and compare to
the incident under investigation.
|
|
|
| |
4.
Interpretation of Behavior |
15 |
|
| |
- Determine the subject’s behavioral norm.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize circumstances or situations, which may alter
the subject’s behavior that are unrelated to deception.
|
|
|
| |
- Observe behavioral responses.
|
|
|
| |
- Evaluate the timing and consistency of behavioral observations.
|
|
|
| |
- Apply behavioral observations to all types of interviews.
|
|
|
| |
- Listen for verbal clues associated with deception or
truthfulness.
|
|
|
| |
- Assign truth, deceptive or inconclusive to the subject’s
status at the conclusion of the interview.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the types of lies, which may be used by a
subject (e.g. omission, fabrication, minimizing, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the structure of truthful and deceptive statements.
|
|
|
| |
- Use the methods of establishing rapport.
|
|
|
| |
- Apply rapport building to the establishment of a behavioral
norm.
|
|
|
| |
- Use proper questioning techniques to evaluate the consistency
of behavioral changes.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize psychological, cultural, and environmental
issues, which may alter a subject’s behavior, but are
unrelated to truth and deception.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize and evaluate behavior associated with denials.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize and evaluate behavior associated with submission.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize and evaluate behaviors associated with assumptive
questions.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine appropriate interviewer response to behavioral
observations.
|
|
|
| |
5.
Accusations |
8 |
|
| |
- Anticipate the subject’s responses to the different
accusations.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine the type of accusation that is appropriate
based on the case and evaluation of the subject.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify other areas of involvement based on the behavioral
observations of the subject during the accusation.
|
|
|
| |
- Use the proper statement sequence to achieve the desired
accusation.
|
|
|
| |
- Select the manner of speaking to match the subject’s
level of intelligence.
|
|
|
| |
6.
Showing Understanding/Rationalization/Themes |
9 |
|
| |
- Use the process of rationalization/themes to encourage
cooperation.
|
|
|
| |
- Consult the background investigation to help determine
potential rationalizations/themes.
|
|
|
| |
- Select appropriate rationalizations/themes based on
the subject’s motive.
|
|
|
| |
- Interpret the subject’s behavioral responses to rationalizations/themes.
|
|
|
| |
- Determine if a change of rationalization/themes is necessary.
|
|
|
| |
- Apply the use of personalization during the rationalization/themes
process.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the problems associated with harsh or vulgar
terminology.
|
|
|
| |
- Recognize the major behavioral phases of showing understanding.
|
|
|
| |
7.
Assumptive Question |
6 |
|
| |
- Recognize the different assumptive questions (e.g.,
alternative/choice question and soft accusation).
|
|
|
| |
- Select appropriate assumptive questions based on the
anticipated outcome.
|
|
|
| |
- Identify the appropriate moment to use an assumptive
question by recognizing the submissive phase.
|
|
|
| |
- Tailor the choice/alternative question to the rationalization/theme
used.
|
|
|
| |
- Evaluate behavior symptoms to determine the appropriate
follow-up to the assumptive question.
|
|
|
| |
8.
Enticement Question/Baiting
Question |
6 |
|
| |
A.
Determine appropriate enticement/bait questions based on
the facts of the case. |
|
|
| |
B.
Identify the proper time to use an enticement/bait question.
|
|
|
| |
C.
Determine if an enticement/bait question will be used in
the non-accusatory interview. |
|
|
| |
D.
Evaluate the subject’s behavioral response to the enticement/bait
question to determine the proper follow-up actions.
|
|
|
| |
E.
Determine when an enticement/bait question can be used as
an accusation. |
|
|
| |
F.
Recognize the legal limits of using enticement/bait questions.
|
|
|
| |
9.
Denials/Backing Out |
12 |
|
| |
A.
Identify
the common causes of denial. |
|
|
| |
B.
Recognize
the two forms of denials (i.e., emphatic, explanatory/objection).
|
|
|
| |
C.
Select
and apply the appropriate techniques to handle the denial.
|
|
|
| |
D.
Evaluate
the strength of the subject’s denial. |
|
|
| |
E.
Recognize
the verbal and physical behavior symptoms associated with
an emphatic denial. |
|
|
| |
F.
Identify
the verbal and physical behavior symptoms associated with
an explanatory/objection denial. |
|
|
| |
G.
Determine
when to “back out” of the interview with the subject.
|
|
|
| |
H.
Use
the appropriate method of backing out of the interview.
|
|
|
| |
I.
Present
specific evidence, incidence or facts for the subject’s
explanation. |
|
|
| |
J.
Verify
the subject’s explanation of the evidence or alibi. |
|
|
| |
K.
Obtain
statements from the witness and subject as appropriate.
|
|
|
| |
10.
Statements |
10 |
|
| |
A.
Recognize
common legal challenges to statements. |
|
|
| |
B.
Identify
the different types of statements available to the interviewer.
|
|
|
| |
C.
Evaluate
the situation to determine the appropriate type of statement
to use. |
|
|
| |
D.
Interpret
the subject’s resistance to giving a statement. |
|
|
| |
E.
Determine
the admissions by the subject which are to be included
in the statement. |
|
|
| |
F.
Determine
if additional development of the admission is appropriate
during the statement. |
|
|
| |
G.
Verify
that the subject’s admission has been substantiated.
|
|
|
| |
H.
Review
the statement for content, completeness, and accuracy.
|
|
|
| |
I.
Identify
and have the subject initial corrections or additions
to the statement. |
|
|
| |
J.
Obtain
supplemental statements from the interview witness to
the subject’s interview. |
|
|
| |
K.
Document
the conversation with all interviewees. |
|
|
| |
L.
Prepare
case report. |
|
|
| |
11.
Telephone Interview |
7 |
|
| |
A.
Determine
if the telephone interview is appropriate for the case
in question. |
|
|
| |
B.
Consult
with decision makers to obtain authorization for a telephone
interview if appropriate. |
|
|
| |
C.
Determine
whether audio/visual taping of the interview or statement
is appropriate. |
|
|
| |
D.
Prepare
the telephone interview outline. |
|
|
| |
E.
Recognize
the differences between telephone and in-person interviews.
|
|
|
| |
F.
Interpret
the subject’s verbal behavior to determine proper follow-up
techniques. |
|
|
| |
12.
Fact Gathering/Cognitive Interviews |
12 |
|
| |
A.
Determine
what types of information will be sought in the interview.
|
|
|
| |
B.
Evaluate
subjects’ background to determine the scope of possible
information available to them. |
|
|
| |
C.
Review
background information to determine areas of potential
resistance by subjects to be interviewed. |
|
|
| |
D.
Conceal
the target of an ongoing investigation if appropriate.
|
|
|
| |
E.
Use
open ended and closed-ended questions to obtain information.
|
|
|
| |
F.
Corroborate
the information that has been provided by the subject.
|
|
|
| |
G.
Review
the interview for possible areas of follow-up. |
|
|
| |
H.
Assign
follow-up interviews to verify or substantiate information
previously obtained.
|
|
|
| |
I.
Recognize
how memories are stored and retrieved. |
|
|
| |
J.
Review
the order of the cognitive interview. |
|
|
| |
K.
Establish
rapport and review pre-interview instructions with the
subject. |
|
|
| |
L.
Use
appropriate sequence of the cognitive interview.
|
|
|
| |
M.
Recognize
the power of suggestibility in interviews. |
|
|
| |
N.
Carefully
select questions that do not suggest answers.
|
|
|
| |
O.
Use
diagrams to confirm, expand or clarify information. |
|
|
| |
P.
Test
statements for consistency. |
|
|
| |
Q.
Listen
for verbal qualifiers. |
|
|
| |
R.
Listen
for assumptions, biases and facts. |
|
|
| |
S.
Determine
when an audio/visual or written statement is appropriate.
|
|
|
| |
T.
Prepare
a report of the interview. |
|
|
| |
U.
Assign
leads for verification or follow-up interviews.
|
|
|
| |
13.
Sexual Harassment Interviewing |
8 |
|
| |
A.
Distinguish between “hostile work environment” and “quid
pro quo” forms of sexual harassment. |
|
|
| |
B.
Identify the legal aspects of sexual harassment. |
|
|
| |
C.
Review appropriate sexual harassment policies of the organization.
|
|
|
| |
D.
Identify the sexual harassment investigative team. |
|
|
| |
E.
Identify victims, witnesses, and subjects involved in the
alleged sexual harassment. |
|
|
| |
F.
Determine the order of the subject interviews.
|
|
|
| |
G.
Identify and preserve evidence of sexual harassment.
|
|
|
| |
H.
Determine the possible motive of the alleged harasser.
|
|
|
| |
I.
Maintain
contact with the victim. |
|
|
| |
J.
Apply appropriate interviews for victim and witnesses.
|
|
|
| |
14.
Behavioral Interviews |
8 |
|
| |
A.
Sequence
questions properly, including the issue in each question.
|
|
|
| |
B.
Use
the behavioral interview to eliminate the innocent.
|
|
|
| |
C.
Use
the behavioral interview to identify the suspect.
|
|
|
| |
D.
Ask
questions in a non-accusatory manner. |
|
|
| |
E.
Evaluate
the subject’s accompanying verbal and physical behavioral
responses. |
|
|
| |
F.
Use
control questions to validate behavioral observations.
|
|
|
| |
G.
Listen
for possible rationalizations/themes or explanatory denials/objections.
|
|
|
| |
H.
Determine
the subject’s resistance to making an admission. |
|
|
| |
I.
Determine
whether an enticement/bait question should be used during
the behavioral interview. |
|
|
| |
15.
Field Interviews |
8 |
|
| |
A.
Implement
officer safety measures during the interview. |
|
|
| |
B.
Control
participants actions to assure officer’s and others’ safety.
|
|
|
| |
C.
Transmit
biographical information to obtain background information.
|
|
|
| |
D.
Use
knowledge of community to make interviewing decisions.
|
|
|
| |
E.
Use
recovered evidence of crimes immediately to interview
subject. |
|
|
| |
F.
Assess
the location to determine area of least distractions.
|
|
|
| |
G.
Actively
use enticement/baiting questions to challenge subject
stories. |
|
|
| |
H.
Use
knowledge of crime patterns to interview subjects. |
|
|
| |
I.
Use
knowledge of past criminal behavior to reduce subject’s
resistance to cooperation. |
|
|
| |
J.
Apply
information from confidential informants to the interview.
|
|
|
| |
K.
Compare
stories from subjects to substantiate events. |
|
|
| |
Totals |
140 |
|
|
|
|
|